How Coca-Cola’s distribution system works

We’ve learnt a lot over the last two years or so about how the Coca-Cola distribution systems work and we thought it would useful to summarise our current state of knowledge so that others can fill any gaps or correct any misconceptions. Please comment.

North Avenue and Coca-Cola Headquarters - Atlanta, Georgia

The first thing to realise is that Coca-Cola is a sort of franchised operation. Most people refer to Cola-Cola as if it were a single entity and it is not. You have the people in Atlanta who take care of the brand and overall marketing, product development and so on, but then each country has its own bottler, or more likely, bottlers. Although Coca-Cola may have an interest in some of these bottling operations they are generally separate legal entities. Having said that, many, in their current form, are totally dependent on Coca-Cola as they do not bottle anything else. However, this is not always the case. In Zambia, for example, Zambian Breweries, a wholly owned subsidiary of SABMiller, is the sole bottler of Coca-Cola in the country, and also bottle beer.

Within each country, the same pattern of devolution is seen when it comes to distribution. In Africa, in our experience, we have seen two sorts of distribution model.
Unloading at Kisima MDC
A delivery to the Kisima MDC, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Image credit: Simon Berry
There is the much trumpeted Manual Distribution Centre (MDC) model which operates within densely populated areas eg around large towns and cities. The MDCs are independent businesses with links to their local bottler who may provide technical support (eg sales training and general support) and credit to the MDCs. The owners of MDCs generally own the bottles and crates they use. They advertise a ‘liquid only’ wholesale price. First time customers (without crates and empty bottles to return) will have to pay for the bottles and crates they take away as well as the liquid they contain. MDCs can be solely dedicated to the sale of Coca-Cola but some are wholesalers of other products as well (eg bottled beer). MDCs are often run from shipping containers painted red. They receive a delivery of Coca-Cola once a week or thereabouts. Typically a Coca-Cola lorry leaving the bottler will visit one MDC which will take the entire load. Distribution from the MDCs is mostly ‘manual’ with crates being loaded on to handcarts, bicycles etc.

The relationship between the MDCs and the bottler is similar to that between the bottlers and Coca-Cola Altanta – although the MDCs are legally independent businesses, many depend on the local Coca-Cola bottler for their business to succeed.

Tanzania Coca-Cola MDC
The loading of handcarts in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Image credit: Tielman Nieuwoudt
The MDC model works very well in densely populated areas where manual onward distribution is feasible due to the short distances involved.

The MDC model is not the system that gets Coca-Cola to very remote areas, as we’ve pointed out previously. So what does? It appears that it is ‘the pull of the Coca-Cola brand’ that is responsible for getting Coca-Cola to the most remote parts of developing countries. There seem to be two parts to this:

  1. People all over the world, even in the most remote parts of developing countries, demand Coca-Cola. This is a function of the marketing efforts which emanate from Atlanta and are then cascaded in each territory (eg in the UK);
  2. There is money to made by everyone who is involved in getting the product to these people.

Lorry leaving Kwanza Bottlers Tanzania Coca-Cola delivery by bicycle
Left: A lorry leaving the Coca-Cola bottling plant in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Image credit: Simon Berry
Right: Coca-Cola being transported by bicycle. Image credit: Owner unknown

The lorry leaving the Coca-Cola bottling plant only goes so far. Beyond the lorry’s reach, an army of entrepreneurs take over, to carry the product the last few miles to the most remote points on the planet. At a recent Business Action for Africa event William Asiko, President, Coca-Cola Africa Foundation and Chair, Business Action for Africa told a story of a recent trip he made to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Coca-Cola has no official presence in the DRC. Despite this when he touched down he was able to buy a cold can of Coca-Cola.

In Zambia, ColaLife wants to emulate this system for AidPod Mother’s Kits (Diarrhoea Treatment Kits packed in AidPods). The basis of our plan to try to do this is described here.

Top image: Coca-Cola headquarters, Atlanta. Image credit: Lee Coursey

Breaking things down, cutting things a different way

African Community With Shop
Graphic from ColaLife Scenarios – Africa Village with shop

ColaLife is a very simple idea. However, if it’s to work it will require people and organisations to work together who have never worked together before. In other words it’s complicated. This has led me to think that perhaps we should take things one step at a time. Our current published strategy does this. First we want to do fieldwork and build the partnership that would be necessary to trial the ColaLife idea and then support this partnership in the co-design of the trial and then do the trial. But may be we should break things down further.

What if we cut things another way? We could focus initially on the issues associated with the distribution chain before we start carrying ‘social products’. This would look at the following:

  1. Options for the design of the AidPod (single use; possible secondary uses; re-usable; biodegradable; insulated etc)
  2. The design of the boxes that would carry them before the individual AidPods are introduced into the drinks crates
  3. The design of the procedures and processes including:
    1. When and how to introduce the AidPods into the system to cause the least friction (both logistical and legal)
    2. Risk assessment for the partners involved
    3. How to mitigate these risks
    4. How to effectively track AidPods
  4. All the informational and motivational elements including:
    1. What incentives would be required, if any, to ensure wholesaler participation?
    2. What would be the key motivators for the retailer?
    3. What would be the key motivators for the bottler/haulier?
  5. What temperature fluctuations would the contents of the AidPods experience?

Such a trial would not require all the regulatory clearance necessary if we were carrying medicines but would provide the information we would need to determine which ‘social products’/medicines could be carried. And this may whet the appetite of the regulators and make the acquisition of regulatory approval more simple down the line.

Thoughts?

Is wealth creation the new philanthropy?

Crate detail
An AidPod’s view of a Coca-cola crate – so much unused space!

Preparing for the Rotterdam conference has served as a reminder that the private sector is there TO MAKE MONEY. People outside the sector say to me, over and over again:

“But why wouldn’t they [Coca-Cola] just do it [ColaLife]?”

The answer is that they will not do anything that interferes with the money making machine.

You can debate the rights and wrongs of this as long as you like but ColaLife is not a debating society! We are trying to work with what’s already there and put things together in new and creative ways to solve an age old disaster that unfolds in developing countries every single day.

So what if the Coca-Cola distributors who took aidpods in their crates made more money than those that didn’t? We’ve always said that this is a possible model but perhaps it should be THE model.

Coca-Cola always say that their bottlers and distributors are ‘independent’ businesses, which is technically true, but I have seen the look of panic on the face of an ‘independent’ distributor when you put an aidpod in one of ‘their’ crates of Coca-Cola.

The fact is that Coca-Cola is very powerful and the livelihoods of most of their small distributors depend on a strong relationship. Distributors would not want to do anything that would jeopardise that relationship. So Coca-Cola would have to agree, or even encourage, their distributors to increase their income by carrying aidpods in Coca-Cola crates.

So perhaps our strategy, in terms of our relationship with Coca-Cola, should be simply to get them to agree to, and ideally promote, the notion of their distributors carrying aidpods in their crates and getting paid for doing so.